<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Botherer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://botherer.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://botherer.org</link>
	<description>John Walker's Electronic House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rum Doings Episode 20: John Finnemore Special</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/10/rum-doings-episode-20-john-finnemore-special/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/03/10/rum-doings-episode-20-john-finnemore-special/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john finnemore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rum doings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a very special edition of Rum Doings, we are joined by comedy writer John Finnemore. We have discussed Mr Finnemore&#8217;s work on Rum Doings in the past, especially the fantastic Radio 4 sitcom Cabin Pressure. He&#8217;s worked on very many radio and television comedies, perhaps most notably as a lead writer for Mitchell &#038; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://pool.cream.org/offtopic/rum300.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>
<p>In <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e20.mp3">a very special edition of Rum Doings</a>, we are joined by comedy writer <a href="http://johnfinnemore.blogspot.com/">John Finnemore</a>. We have discussed Mr Finnemore&#8217;s work on Rum Doings in the past, especially the fantastic Radio 4 sitcom <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/comedy/cabin_pressure.shtml">Cabin Pressure</a>. He&#8217;s worked on very many radio and television comedies, perhaps most notably as a lead writer for Mitchell &#038; Webb on both Radio 4 and BBC 2, and despite this still agreed to join us for our twentieth episode.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a topic not under discussion this week too: how are we going to inoculate ourselves against Britain&#8217;s road rage epidemic.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll not be surprised to learn much of the topics this week are radio and TV comedy &#8211; subjects we&#8217;ve spoken about a great deal before. We begin with Cabin Pressure, and quickly move on to the sitcoms that inspired Finnemore, especially Yes Minister. Then find out which surprising 70s sitcom David Mitchell is a fan of, as well as enjoy a brief dissection of The Fall And Rise Of Reginald Perrin. Nick attempts to get John W in trouble, telling tales about his disliking of Fawlty Towers, and then everything goes horribly wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>Finnemore defends Victoria Wood&#8217;s &#8216;dinnerladies&#8217;. Oh dear. It all falls apart. It almost comes to blows.</p>
<p>Fortunately we quickly move on to John Shuttleworth, good comedy we can all agree on. This takes us to Dad&#8217;s Army, which in turn brings us back to Cabin Pressure, especially the desert episode and the fantastic appearance of John Sessions. Nick then launches into a brilliant attempt to tell Finnemore that he&#8217;s wrong about the nature of one of his own characters &#8211; one he even voices himself. This leads to a lovely discussion of the nature of happiness, as viewed through the Goons.</p>
<p>After more discussion of Cabin Pressure, then talk of the relationship between The Mitchell &#038; Webb Sound and Look, we arrive at the topic of comedians doing advertising. Then changing from commercials to the other side, there&#8217;s talk of why the BBC is such a great thing but so desperately lacking self-confidence.</p>
<p>Huge thanks to John Finnemore for joining us for our twentieth episode. We strongly recommend you get hold of Cabin Pressure. It&#8217;s a funny and warm radio sitcom of the like that&#8217;s very rare today. You can buy both series from Audible <a href="http://www.audible.co.uk/aduk/site/product.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=Yes&#038;p=RT_BBCW_002329UK">here</a> and <a href="http://www.audible.co.uk/aduk/site/product.jsp?p=BK_BBCW_003071UK&#038;BV_UseBVCookie=Yes">here</a>, or from iTunes <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAudiobook?id=298587989&#038;s=143444">here</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAudiobook?id=337349215&#038;s=143444">here</a>. Oh, and we should probably add that you can hear Finnemore on this week&#8217;s episode of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qgt7">The Now Show</a>, 6.30, Friday on Radio 4. Yes, we&#8217;re aware of the irony of this.</p>
<p>Do let other people know about this episode, by whichever means you think best. And <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">writing a review on iTunes</a> helps us a great deal. We&#8217;d appreciate it.</p>
<p>If you want to email us, you can <a href="mailto:podcast@rumdoings.com">do that here</a>.</p>
<p>To get this episode directly, <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e20.mp3">right click and save here</a>. To subscribe to Rum Doings <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/podcast/feed/2">click here</a>, or you can find it in <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">iTunes here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/03/10/rum-doings-episode-20-john-finnemore-special/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e20.mp3" length="54577168" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rum Doings Episode 19</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/rum-doings-episode-19/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/rum-doings-episode-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rum doings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Episode 19 is here. This week&#8217;s topic isn&#8217;t: Why are we English too ASHAMED to celebrate St. George&#8217;s Day with due dignity and respect, properly? Which is embarrassing to even type.
Things more realistically begin with an explanation of the spiteful nature of tea, pet names for pets, and that which we&#8217;ve changed from hating to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://pool.cream.org/offtopic/rum300.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>
<p><a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e19.mp3">Episode 19 is here</a>. This week&#8217;s topic isn&#8217;t: Why are we English too ASHAMED to celebrate St. George&#8217;s Day with due dignity and respect, properly? Which is embarrassing to even type.</p>
<p>Things more realistically begin with an explanation of the spiteful nature of tea, pet names for pets, and that which we&#8217;ve changed from hating to liking. Find out what temperature we&#8217;ve decided will keep your babies alive, and how John disagrees with all baby-based wisdom, leading to Nick denying his daughter her wings.</p>
<p>Of course we talk about Mr Blobby, and Noel&#8217;s House Party, and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdakKgmYH7I">Late Late Breakfast Show</a>. But you&#8217;d been expecting that. And find out who electrocuted an elephant to death. Hear Nick play the mouth-banjo. Don&#8217;t hear Nick tell his Oxford interview story. But do hear stories of examinations.</p>
<p>This takes us back to school days, remembering teachers good and bad, and times we went out of our way to get in trouble. And then, more positively, favourite teachers.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few things we ask for in return for this lovely gift. Could you retweet about it, demand people on forums have a listn, or find any other way to tell new people to listen? And <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">writing a review on iTunes</a> helps us a great deal. We&#8217;d appreciate it.</p>
<p>To get this episode directly, <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e19.mp3">right click and save here</a>. To subscribe to Rum Doings <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/podcast/feed/2">click here</a>, or you can find it in <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">iTunes here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/rum-doings-episode-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e19.mp3" length="47075637" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK Go &#8211; This Too Shall Pass</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/ok-go-this-too-shall-pass/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/ok-go-this-too-shall-pass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like it&#8217;s fun to post this while it&#8217;s still under 200k views, but in a larger part because this is a celebration of a victory over EMI, with the video being embeddable. To find out why that matters, see here. Meanwhile, this is absolutely astonishing, whether the cut after the blue curtains is terrible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it&#8217;s fun to post this while it&#8217;s still under 200k views, but in a larger part because this is a celebration of a victory over EMI, with the video being embeddable. To find out why that matters, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/opinion/20kulash.html">see here</a>. Meanwhile, this is absolutely astonishing, whether the cut after the blue curtains is terrible or not. Cheers to Kim for alerting me.</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qybUFnY7Y8w&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qybUFnY7Y8w&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/03/03/ok-go-this-too-shall-pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television Round-Up Part 3: H &#8211; L</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/01/television-round-up-part-3-h-l/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/03/01/television-round-up-part-3-h-l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So yes, I&#8217;m doing H again, but that&#8217;s because I just discovered How To Make It In America. So there it is. There&#8217;s the notable exception of It&#8217;s Always Sunny In Philadelphia below. It&#8217;s a brilliant show and I&#8217;m seasons behind. I&#8217;ll eventually catch up, because it&#8217;s always worth watching. But I haven&#8217;t, and don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So yes, I&#8217;m doing H again, but that&#8217;s because I just discovered How To Make It In America. So there it is. There&#8217;s the notable exception of It&#8217;s Always Sunny In Philadelphia below. It&#8217;s a brilliant show and I&#8217;m seasons behind. I&#8217;ll eventually catch up, because it&#8217;s always worth watching. But I haven&#8217;t, and don&#8217;t have anything relevant to say about it.</p>
<p>If you read nothing else in this post, please watch the video under Leverage. It&#8217;s four minutes that won&#8217;t be wasted.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://howtomakeitinamerica.com/">How To Make It In America &#8211; HBO</a></p>
<p>To describe it this sounds like every first-year student TV writing project. Two guys who live on the edge of a criminal lifestyle, yet somehow hanging out on the elite New York partying scene, swearing at each other and attracting all who pass by. Yet the delivery changes a lot. The cast is strong (Luis Guzmán being reliably menacing alongside the younger, prettier crowd), and it&#8217;s occasionally aesthetically inspired. The direction is smart, and with a fantastic soundtrack (helpfully <a href="http://howtomakeitinamerica.com/episode-1-soundtrack/">documented on the show&#8217;s site</a>), its presentation helps cover gaps the perhaps not stunningly original themes may leave. The second scene of the first episode, pulling back to reveal Victor Rasuk standing on the back of a bicycle ridden by a Hasidic Jewish boy, outlines the smart wit. &#8220;Stay strong, He-brew.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if the guys-struggling-to-keep-up-with-the-scene story is strong enough to sustain. In terms of story theme it feels like it falls halfway between the astonishing Bored To Death and the atrocious Entourage. There&#8217;s a tendency for the characters to speak in speeches, which feels a shame in a show that would benefit from a more naturalistic delivery. The heavy script of Bored To Death works so well because it&#8217;s so spectacularly refined, but here it seems to be holding things back somewhat. People don&#8217;t say, &#8220;He who hesitates masturbates!&#8221; and then twinkle their eyes. And perhaps they didn&#8217;t need the drunk guy shouting to his ex-girlfriend from the street scene immediately. Or someone complaining about being woken up and pulling the pillow over their head&#8230; But wow, the soundtrack helps me forgive a lot.</p>
<p><span id="more-1774"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hbo.com/in-treatment/index.html">In Treatment &#8211; HBO</a></p>
<p>Season 1 of In Treatment was probably one of the most masterful television programmes ever made. Season 2 started off matching it. I didn&#8217;t finish it. I had to stop. Its hopeless misery combined with something I struggle to cope with: impending doom. Impending doom is something I find very off-putting in all formats &#8211; it&#8217;s about the inevitable awfulness that&#8217;s to come and there&#8217;s nothing I can do to stop it. I recognise this as my own madness, but watching In Treatment was putting me on the verge of an anxiety attack (this isn&#8217;t hyperbole) and it was healthier to stop. I fully plan to go back to finish it, because good heavens, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a better written or performed programme on TV. But only when I&#8217;m feeling remarkably upbeat and comfortable, and thus emotionally prepared to get through it. I&#8217;m not sure I could pay the programme a higher compliment than this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/tv/racerelations/">John Safran&#8217;s Race Relations &#8211; ABC Australia</a></p>
<p>I think I have far more to say about this show than fits in here. It&#8217;s extraordinary. I just haven&#8217;t worked out if it&#8217;s a brilliant statement on race and relationships, or the most horrendous thing I&#8217;ve ever seen. Safran is a 37 year old (although looks ten years younger) white Jew living in Australia, trying to work out whether he should settle down with a nice Jewish girl like his mother always wanted, or follow his desire for Eurasian girls. Along the way he tries to understand racial divides of many sorts, by some really quite troubling first-hand experience.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been making these part-documentary, part-comedy shows for years, each using his affection for pranks as a basis for making arguments on various topics. How relevant or appropriate you think the stunts are, and whether they achieve anything close to a statement on the topics for you, will likely define whether you think him a genius or scumbag. So for this series, well, how do you feel about his visiting an Israeli sperm bank to make a donation, then getting his Palestinian cameraman to provide the sample? Then repeating the same in reverse in Palestine, this time smuggling his own Jewish seed into the vaults. Or blacking up and hanging out with unwitting members of a New York militant black organisation, and then preaching in a predominantly black church. Or stealing the underwear of ex-girlfriends and Eurasian celebrities in order to perform an experiment. Or getting off with their mums. Or getting crucified, including having nails driven through his hands and feet. And it goes on. (Like digging up his mother&#8217;s grave to perform a Kabbalah prayer, for instance.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an enormous amount of squirming to get through an episode. His willingness to subject himself to hideous humiliation is extremely uncomfortable. For me, when the humiliation occurs to others (which is extremely rarely, to be fair), the discomfort becomes too much. Watching him in Thailand, dressed as a Eurasian woman (one of his exes, more disturbingly) and going on a date with a local amorous man, getting paralytically drunk and making out with him, then sleeping in the street outside &#8211; no one&#8217;s better for it. Goodness knows if any of it&#8217;s real &#8211; I hope it&#8217;s not. The blacking up in episode 2 is&#8230; it&#8217;s probably the most terrifying thing I&#8217;ve seen. But it&#8217;s hard to find too much complaint with a man who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rBCst4hph0">attempts to gas David Irving in a radio studio</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/kidsinthehall/">Kids In The Hall: Death Comes To Town &#8211; CBC</a></p>
<p>The news that the Kids In The Hall were to reunite on television was hard to know how to take. The sketch show finished in 1994, with the ultro-flop movie Brain Candy released in &#8216;96. Despite reunion tours and live shows over the last decade, it&#8217;s still 16 years since they were last on TV. I adored the original show back then, and I still do. The DVDs take up a lot of space on my shelves. Discovering KITH was one of those watershed moments for me, switching on Channel 4 one night aged 14/15 and seeing comedy delivered in a way I hadn&#8217;t experienced before. It was unquestionably hit and miss. Deliberately so, it seemed. Many sketches were just thoughts, whims, without any perceivable direction. And none of their sketches ever reached a conclusion. They were the sketch comedy equivalent of a song that fades out rather than comes to a prescribed ending, each scene dissolving into mumbled lines while the audience whooped to let the viewer know it was over. Also, while men playing women wasn&#8217;t anything new for sketch comedy, playing them convincingly was. Despite knowing almost no one who watched it, everyone seems to remember Mr. Tyzik crushing people&#8217;s heads from his deckchair. I&#8217;m not quite sure how this character permeated a generation&#8217;s consciousness without anyone ever actually watching it.</p>
<p>It was my Python. I was born three years after Flying Circus finished, and it wasn&#8217;t usefully repeated until my later teenage years. Kids In The Hall caught me at just the right moment, similarly peculiar and uninterested in following traditional sketch form. And importantly for a kid my age, showed me gay characters in an unmelodramatic way &#8211; something British TV certainly wasn&#8217;t doing.</p>
<p>Toward the end the sketches grew longer, less stage-based and more often shot on film. It was clear they were interested in the single-camera format. Which gives me an excuse to put in this longer sketch from season 4, that highlights most of the things described above, and also shows off Mark McKinney&#8217;s range (playing the preacher enemy, one of the Sex Girls, and the director at the start):</p>
<p><center><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F6SauEA5NKQ&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F6SauEA5NKQ&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>So what to think about their getting back together to create a new show, single camera, and without an audience. Clearly as a huge KITH fan it seemed like brilliant news. But then should you ever go back? In this case, well, possibly not.</p>
<p>Death Comes To Town unapologetically borrows from The League Of Gentlemen. It&#8217;s a provincial Canadian town populated by people played by the five members of the troupe, following the events following their mayor&#8217;s death shortly after learning they would not be hosting the 2016 Olympics. Death has, shockingly enough, come to town, and has a few people&#8217;s souls to collect while he&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly true to the KITH format. They play most of the characters, they&#8217;re mostly caricatures, and it&#8217;s paced extremely slowly. However, each episode feels a little empty. I think what&#8217;s revealed more than anything else is how valuable the audience was on the &#8217;90s show, providing both someone for the troupe to perform to, and some punctuation for the viewer. While they&#8217;re not aiming for big laughs, the cameo appearance of McKinney&#8217;s Chicken Lady would have been a lot more meaningful and entertaining if there&#8217;d been the inevitable chorus of cheers as she appeared.</p>
<p>But more importantly they don&#8217;t go far enough in any direction. Where League of Gentlemen was grotesque, this is extremely mild. Even the incredibly slow-burning plot of the gay man in love with the mayor who&#8217;s dug up his corpse and is attempting a life of marital bliss is somehow extremely forgettable. And I&#8217;m having a good deal of trouble working out exactly what Death is doing, or why. It does show off the skills of everyone involved. McKinney is unsurprisingly the best, but Scott Thompson&#8217;s range is quite phenomenal. It&#8217;s just hard to shake the idea that they&#8217;re spreading enough plot for one episode across two or three.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dadt.com/lots/">Legend Of The Seeker &#8211; Various</a></p>
<p>Based on The Sword Of Truth novels by Terry Goodkind, this is the only trad fantasy left on TV (unless I&#8217;m mistaken). Following the adventures of Richard, the Seeker, a young man who is imbued with enhanced instincts and sword-fighting skills, accompanied by the wizard of the First Order Zeddicus Zu&#8217;l Zorander and Confessor Kahlan (and currently a Mord&#8217;Sith called Cara), they, um, wander about fighting stuff.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fun writing all that nonsense. This is mostly played very straight, but thanks to executive production from Sam Raimi and Robert Tapert there&#8217;s just enough of a Xena/Hercules vibe to keep it light, although never ironic. (And of course this means Ted Raimi has appeared twice now. Still no sign of Bruce Campbell, but surely it can only be a matter of time? He must miss the flight to New Zealand.) The first season was about fighting Darken Rahl, an evil ruler who controlled vast armies, determined to take over the whole of the land. Season 2 has him in the Underworld, still causing trouble, but in a much more ambiguous way that leaves the crew more open to stumbling into more varied situations. They&#8217;re technically following some magic compass thing now, to stop the Satan-alike from using everyone&#8217;s dead bodies to start an army, but despite travelling for squillions of miles to follow this they&#8217;re still always a day&#8217;s walk from anywhere they&#8217;ve been before. I&#8217;d love to see someone trace the route they&#8217;ve taken this season on a map.</p>
<p>Other brilliant things include that Zed says, &#8220;This is a DARK and TERRIBLE magic!&#8221; every week about every magic thing he ever encounters. And Kahlan will confess (putting her hands on someone&#8217;s throat which makes their eyes turn black and then they become her devoted slave forever) someone every week, who will then be conveniently killed later so she doesn&#8217;t have to have him follow her about. Oh, and they&#8217;ve take the Pushing Daisies approach to the Will They Won&#8217;t They, by setting up a situation where if Kahlan sleeps with Richard he&#8217;ll be confessed and therefore not able to save the world any more. Except this appears to be only a challenge to the writers to find excuses for them to cop off and get away with it. Last week Kahlan was bodily split into two halves of her personality, one half unable to confess, so they ran full pelt to the nearest grassy spot.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re spending decent money on each episode ($1.5m, apparently, which is a hefty chunk for a show that&#8217;s made as a first-run syndication, meaning it&#8217;s not on any fixed channel &#8211; ABC pays for it, but doesn&#8217;t air it), and the fights are often very splendid. While serious, it avoids being po-faced. I like it far more than I probably should.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tnt.tv/series/leverage/">Leverage &#8211; TNT</a></p>
<p>Season 2 of the techo Robin Hood has been given an advantage by the show&#8217;s weak link, Gina Bellman, being away on maternity leave, replaced by the far superior Jeri Ryan. The band of thieves help to right a wrong by scamming the rich to make money for the poor, using elaborate cons that require constant improvisation as twists and turns arrive from each angle. Season 1 was a far tighter run, however. Season 2 has had some really disappointingly dull episodes, alongside some splendid ones. However, one episode in particular makes up for any other that&#8217;s lacking: their open, bold reveal of all the scams and tricks used by so-called mediums. It should be shown in schools as the most spectacular lesson on how cold reading, and hot reading, work &#8211; a step by step breakdown that explains it all with even more clarity than James Randi&#8217;s eloquent lectures. Parker was cold read by the medium, who talked about her brother who had died on his bicycle, which she had taught him to ride. Well, here it is:</p>
<p><center><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XszTgRYBqHM&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XszTgRYBqHM&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>It&#8217;s never been done so well. And then the rest of the episode is about getting spectacular, fair revenge on this dreadful man. And yes, that was Luke Perry.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/lietome/">Lie To Me &#8211; FOX</a></p>
<p>This is another show, like Castle, that has really found its feet in its second run. The first season was a fun show, but felt extremely laboured. Tim Roth is an expert at detecting when people are lying via recognising micro-gestures. And because of this he can solve all murders and prevent terrorists from blowing up the world. In the first season it was so tortuous as they created a super-sized version of the scrap of science behind it all, making it ludicrous. &#8220;Did you see that?! Stop it just there!&#8221; cries Roth, as they freezeframe the gurning criminal contorting his face into a cartoon grimace. Yes Mr Roth, we all did. Season 2 has been far more relaxed, focusing on the far more interesting aspects of the show &#8211; primarily Roth&#8217;s being a cock and always right. Unlike House, Roth&#8217;s Dr. Cal Lightman always has a good reason for being rude to people, provoking the emotional response he needs, or whatever. But it&#8217;s still fun to watch his Quasimodo lurching and grumpy right-being. Plus it had a song.</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UMaaXq97Rf4&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UMaaXq97Rf4&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>Sorry to end on that, but it had to stop somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/03/01/television-round-up-part-3-h-l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tory Position On License Fee Explained</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/tory-position-on-license-fee-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/tory-position-on-license-fee-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a handy guide to understanding the future of the BBC under the Conservatives. A schools pack is available.
Stuart X: It&#8217;s like that thing they had to cancel with local-news websites or video or something last year, because it was so good that commercial operations couldn&#8217;t compete.
Stuart X: WHY THE FUCK ARE WE SUPPOSED [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Here is a handy guide to understanding the future of the BBC under the Conservatives. A schools pack is available.</em></p>
<p><b>Stuart X</b>: It&#8217;s like that thing they had to cancel with local-news websites or video or something last year, because it was so good that commercial operations couldn&#8217;t compete.<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: WHY THE FUCK ARE WE SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT THAT?<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: We&#8217;re forced by law to pay for something that&#8217;s made deliberately worse.<br />
<b>John X</b>: Don&#8217;t worry, not for much longer!<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: They&#8217;re going to stop charging?!??!!???!!?<br />
<b>John X</b>: Entirely!<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: And it won&#8217;t turn out to be just another shitty ITV??!?!?!!?!?!<br />
<b>John X</b>: No no, you misunderstand.<br />
<b>John X</b>: Imagine it like this:<br />
<b>John X</b>: Imagine I&#8217;m a bread shop.<br />
<b>John X</b>: And I sell bread for 80p a loaf.<br />
<b>John X</b>: Okay?<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: Following you so far.<br />
<b>John X</b>: So if you want some bread, currently you have to pay me 80p.<br />
<b>John X</b>: Well, what&#8217;s going to happen under the nice Mr Cameron is my bread shop is going to be destroyed by a nuclear bomb.<br />
<b>John X</b>: So you won&#8217;t have to pay 80p for bread ever again!<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: But where will I get bread?<br />
<b>John X</b>: There&#8217;s no bread.<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: I don&#8217;t understand! I LIKE BREAD!<br />
<b>John X</b>: Be quiet.<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: The only other stuff I can put marmalade on is made by Ian&#8217;s Tasty Vittles down the road, and it&#8217;s made of dogshit.<br />
<b>John X</b>: I said be quiet.<br />
<b>Stuart X</b>: And I have to stop eating every three bites so I can throw up.<br />
<b>John X</b>: Can somebody call the police?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/tory-position-on-license-fee-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule #38</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/rule-38/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/rule-38/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Rule. It&#8217;s an emergency one.
#38 NO ONLINE ACCOUNTS FOR BABIES OR PETS OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT ISN&#8217;T YOU.
Completely outlawed are Twitter, Facebook, Bebo or whatever else accounts for anyone that isn&#8217;t you. Your baby can neither read nor write, let alone comprehend what Twitter is. Your baby is a barely sentient parasite, and there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Rule. It&#8217;s an emergency one.</p>
<p>#38 NO ONLINE ACCOUNTS FOR BABIES OR PETS OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT ISN&#8217;T YOU.</p>
<p>Completely outlawed are Twitter, Facebook, Bebo or whatever else accounts for anyone that isn&#8217;t you. Your baby can neither read nor write, let alone comprehend what Twitter is. Your baby is a barely sentient parasite, and there&#8217;s nothing cute or endearing about pretending that he or she is writing your observations that you somehow think &#8211; despite there being almost 7 billion people are alive &#8211; are unique to your vomiting blob.</p>
<p>The same goes for pets. Your cat isn&#8217;t typing, is it? What is it doing? It&#8217;s ignoring you, isn&#8217;t it? Your cat has better things to do than you, which is why it&#8217;s not writing on Twitter about how much it loves its mummy. You are. So stop it, because <em>good grief</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/rule-38/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television: Psych (Repost)</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/television-psych-repost/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/television-psych-repost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m reposting this piece about Psych written about a year and a half ago as it&#8217;s no longer online elsewhere. Giant Realm briefly had me writing about TV (one day, somewhere, I&#8217;ll get a regular gig writing about TV for a magazine or website that won&#8217;t immediately close down) before they pulled their entire blog. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://pool.cream.org/blog/psych.jpg" alt="I wonder if USA will complain about this stolen image to promote their show." /></p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m reposting this piece about <a href="http://www.usanetwork.com/series/psych/">Psych</a> written about a year and a half ago as it&#8217;s no longer online elsewhere. Giant Realm briefly had me writing about TV (one day, somewhere, I&#8217;ll get a regular gig writing about TV for a magazine or website that won&#8217;t immediately close down) before they pulled their entire blog. This is the unedited version, because the edited was so comprehensively translated into American that it often didn&#8217;t read like me.</p>
<p>And I should add in the interests of balance, this week&#8217;s episode of Psych was </em>awful<em>. Fortunately, last week&#8217;s was one of the best ever.</em></p>
<p>At the mention of its name, the reaction people give to Psych tends to be, “That show? Really? I saw maybe one episode – it seemed alright.” I want to put that right. I want to convince you that Psych is the most entertaining show on TV this summer. I will use a collection of silly names, and a pineapple.</p>
<p>The show’s conceit, to put it mildly, is contrived. Shawn Spencer (James Roday, Miss Match) is the son of a retired cop, who spent his childhood having observational skills drummed into him by his forbidding father. As an adult he’s kept his hyper-observant talents, but no job for longer than three months. That’s until his habit for solving crimes by watching the local evening news caused the police to become suspicious. Needing a way out to prevent his being arrested, he invented the story that he was a psychic, convincing the officers and detectives by throwing out a few ‘hot reads’ based on all the stuff his eagle eyes had spotted. Well, convincing all of them but one, the surly Detective Lassiter (Timothy Omundson) remaining heavily sceptical.</p>
<p><span id="more-1762"></span></p>
<p>Realising the potential for this, and being asked by the (interim) police chief (Kirsten Nelson) to help out on a case, Shawn ropes in his childhood best friend, Burton ‘Gus’ Guster (West Wing’s Dulé Hill), and forms the private detective agency, Psych. So far, so much nonsense. But that’s the key. This is about nonsense, from top to bottom to either side. It’s a celebration of being silly, loosely draped over a fond parody of procedural crime drama. Embrace the nonsense, and you won’t be able to resist the show.</p>
<p>Created and overseen by Steve Franks (er, writer of Big Daddy, but ignore that), Psych’s ensemble cast (also including L.A. Law veteran Corbin Bersnen as Shawn’s dad, and Maggie Lawson as Detective Lassiter’s junior partner, Juliet O’Hara) are given a joyful freedom to improvise within the structure. And fantastically, they’re all competent and confident to do that. In fact, many of the series’ best running gags have begun as off-script moments.</p>
<p>So a typical episode: There’s a flashback to the 80s, as we see little Shawn and Gus up to some childhood shenanigans, which will reflect on that episode’s theme. Cut to the present day, and Shawn and Gus stumble upon a crime, often a murder, either by coincidence or being called in by the police. Shawn then scans the scene, takes in all the vital information, and cracks irreverent comments in inappropriate surroundings. Gus huffs and puffs in the background, and complains that he should be at work, or runs outside to be sick. Then Shawn drags Gus along on his entirely illegal methods of investigation (breaking into places, reading private documents, that sort of thing) and then later has a “psychic vision” for the police that legitimately leads them toward what he’d illegitimately found. Ploughing through a few suspects, and a row with his dad, eventually Shawn will pip the cops to the post, and present his Poirot-meets-Seann William Scott accusatory speech. The criminal fesses up, and Lassiter groans. Cue gags for epilogue.</p>
<p>But the reason this works, the reason this is the show that should be filling your empty months of television’s summer wasteland, is because this is simply the framework to support that episode’s daftness. Each episode is themed. Perhaps it’s spoofing a particular television programme, like season 2’s opener, American Duos, tearing American Idol a new one, with the most cruel and hilarious mockery of Paula Abdul’s, er, tiredness and confusion. Nevermind Tim Curry as a Simon Cowell-like, spitting venomous bile while someone is incessantly trying to murder him. Or perhaps it’s their recent tribute to The Goonies, with Steven Weber as Shawn’s treasure hunting uncle, brilliantly titled “The Greatest Adventure In The History Of Basic Cable”. (Actually, I want to throw a couple of other episode titles at you, because, well, they’re brilliant. “Meat Is Murder, But Murder Is Also Murder,” for instance. Or how about, “Woman Seeking Dead Husband: Smokers Okay, No Pets”? Their Latino soap opera episode, “Lights Camera… Homicido”? But I don’t know whether, purely for its literal simplicity, “Gus’s Dad May Have Killed An Old Guy” can be beaten).</p>
<p>Each episode contains an array of running jokes. Shawn introducing Gus to a stranger is always best, and one of the gags that began as an improvised moment by James Roday when he said, “Hello, I’m Shawn Spencer and this is my partner, Gus ‘Sillypants’ Jackson.” The writers picked up on it, and it’s inescapable. “My name is Byron Bojangles III, this is my partner, Shutterfly Simmons.” After breaking into hospital changing rooms, emerging in a white coat: “Hello, I’m Dr. Howser, and this is my personal candy striper, Nicknack.” Forced to work alongside his father in this season’s “Disco Didn’t Die. It Was Murdered!”, (a ludicrous tribute to 1970s cop shows, including the most remarkably dumb excuse for having them dressed up in appropriately ‘hip’ clothing), he exasperatedly interrupts Shawn’s attempt with, “Yeah, yeah, that’s his partner Methuselah Honeysuckle, which makes me Old Scratch Johnson.”</p>
<p>I’m not winning you over with silly names? How about a never-explained love for the pineapple, the pleasingly-shaped fruit making a cameo appearance in every episode, no matter how strained? No? Dammit. Well, try this: Psych has to be the only show on television in which the two heroes run away at the merest sight of danger. Both are complete cowards, pegging it the moment something unusual happens. The gusto they put into their fleeing is worth the show alone.</p>
<p>I’m not sure it can be done without just watching it. And I implore you to give it a go. The cast are so strong, and confident enough with their roles to be able to try to throw each other in the middle of a scene. Outtakes prove that rarely is the same line delivered twice in following takes. The guest stars are increasingly fantastic, the most recent featuring the permanently brilliant Jane Lynch. The themes are increasingly rich, the second episode of the current run (“Murder?&#8230; Anyone?&#8230; Anyone?&#8230; Bueller?”) built around every John Hughes movie ever, including Shawn’s performance of all the dances from that awful scene in The Breakfast Club. Oh, just watch it, please!</p>
<p>This is what it comes down to: Good television writing is to be treasured. That it happens to be a show with the most ridiculous conceit of all, and one that frankly doesn’t make much sense by season 3 where he might just as well tell the police he isn’t a psychic, what with a proven record of over 30 arrests based on his observational skills, isn’t a reason to roll your eyes at it. It’s a reason to realise the writers totally get that, and love it. They mock conventions of television constantly, Shawn once thanking Gus for “nutshelling” the story so far. It’s self-aware, bubbling over with enthusiasm, beautifully scripted, and with a stunning cast. It just happens to be ludicrous. And that’s great. And that’s why you should love it. Final proof. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvM3RHLyzOo">Watch this utterly irrelevant trailer</a>.</p>
<p>(Not embedded because the USA network is so ASTONISHINGLY stupid that they&#8217;ve prevented embedding on A TRAILER FOR THEIR PROGRAMME.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/26/television-psych-repost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rum Doings Episode 18</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/24/rum-doings-episode-18/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/24/rum-doings-episode-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rum doings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In an unprecedented eighteenth episode of Rum Doings we don&#8217;t discuss what we will do on Earth about potholes. However, we do quite brilliantly demonstrate how to drink. And then immediately return to our favourite topic of recent times: ketchup. Via some quite astonishing observation comedy, of course. But we promise the ketchup talk is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://pool.cream.org/offtopic/rum300.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>
<p>In an unprecedented <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e18.mp3">eighteenth episode of Rum Doings</a> we don&#8217;t discuss what we will do on Earth about potholes. However, we do quite brilliantly demonstrate how to drink. And then immediately return to our favourite topic of recent times: ketchup. Via some quite astonishing observation comedy, of course. But we promise the ketchup talk is confined to only the beginning.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s happy stories of service experiences, which leads us to what will be remembered by history as the greatest series of &#8220;time&#8221; themed puns mankind has ever heard. And welcome to the new job title: the shorekeeper. Then there&#8217;s Nick&#8217;s racist t-shirt and his mule child.</p>
<p>Then it&#8217;s time for part two of <a href="http://botherer.org/the-rules/">The Rules</a>, which those who didn&#8217;t want us to do any more will be pleased to learn completes the collection. Where we learn that all our listeners should all embrace death, because they can&#8217;t be bothered to promote us or write to us.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few things we ask for in return for this present. Could you retweet about it, or find a way to tell new people to listen? And <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">writing a review on iTunes</a> helps us a great deal. We&#8217;d appreciate it.</p>
<p>To get this episode directly, <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e18.mp3">right click and save here</a>. To subscribe to Rum Doings <a href="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/podcast/feed/2">click here</a>, or you can find it in <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=327474516">iTunes here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/24/rum-doings-episode-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e18.mp3" length="49226037" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://rumdoings.jellycast.com/files/audio/rumdoings_e18.mp3" length="49226037" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television Round-Up Part 2: F-H</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/23/television-round-up-part-2-f-h/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/23/television-round-up-part-2-f-h/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed out so many the last time I did this, and with The Amazing Race having started, I feel like I should start from A again. But really this is F-H, with a few extras beforehand. I&#8217;ve decided to implement a code. If there&#8217;s spoilers in the piece I&#8217;ll have * at the start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I missed out so many <a href="http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/">the last time I did this</a>, and with The Amazing Race having started, I feel like I should start from A again. But really this is F-H, with a few extras beforehand. I&#8217;ve decided to implement a code. If there&#8217;s spoilers in the piece I&#8217;ll have * at the start of stuff you shouldn&#8217;t read. Assume that it will spoil anything that&#8217;s happened in that show up to the current (US) episode. There are also some bad swears in there, delicate-eared readers. Oh, and let me know if I&#8217;ve missed anything. I know there&#8217;s still stuff from <a href="http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/">A-E</a> that I&#8217;ve forgotten a second time.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbs.com/primetime/amazing_race/">The Amazing Race &#8211; CBS</a></p>
<p>Well, what&#8217;s to say. Eleven teams of two in a race around the world. It&#8217;s such a huge idea, and it&#8217;s still working <i>sixteen</i> seasons in. Perhaps what I like best about the global scale racing nonsense is that the best teams tend to win. Stupid people go out first, unpleasant people then follow, and generally it&#8217;s the nice lot left to win at the end. And if you don&#8217;t love Phil, there&#8217;s something wrong with your DNA.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usanetwork.com/series/burnnotice/">Burn Notice &#8211; USA</a></p>
<p>Season one of this programme was confused. After a horrible pilot it quickly ditched a few ideas, found a groove, but didn&#8217;t really know whether to take itself seriously. By season three it really knows what it wants to be. Light-hearted, while dealing with life or death situations. The gimmick &#8211; that burned spy Michael Weston narrates giving advice to the audience for how to be a spy in various situations &#8211; still works. And it seems to trust Bruce Campbell to be Bruce Campbell a lot more. The most recent episode featured Campbell doing the most fantastic spoof of CSI, openly playing for laughs, as is more frequently the case. The theme now is for Weston to have a long-running nemesis whom he must work for/against in the hope it will get him closer to learning who burned him, while taking on weekly cases for the seemingly infinite number of friends of friends in trouble. This means we get to see him trying juggle both situations, and inevitably his chain smoking mother, while teaching us how to bug a car or break into a guarded office. It&#8217;s so silly, and thankfully it now knows it.</p>
<p><span id="more-1745"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.syfy.com/caprica/">Caprica &#8211; Syfy</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not sure what I think of this four episodes in. Boy, they weren&#8217;t kidding when they said Dynasty with robots, were they? It doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense bearing in mind the channel it&#8217;s on. Were this on ABC, I could see the sense in trying to establish soap opera plots between warring families and so on. But it&#8217;s on the Sci Fi channel (no matter how idiotically they choose to spell that), and I&#8217;m not convinced that your average drama viewer really wants there to be an eight foot robot with the soul of a teenage girl trapped inside it. In fact, I feel like I&#8217;ve just talked myself out of watching it.</p>
<p><a href="http://sho.com/site/dexter">Dexter &#8211; Showtime</a></p>
<p>How could I have forgotten Dexter? Well, mostly because its run had finished by the time I wrote the last post. After a disappointing third season, season 4 really brought it home. Season 3 couldn&#8217;t figure out what to do with Dexter, and ended up meandering wildly while really only repeating patterns. The arrival of John Lithgow changed everything. Dexter had someone to look up to. A serial killer who&#8217;d been working for decades, and one who managed to maintain a family &#8211; Dexter&#8217;s dream. With Rita having had their baby, and her previous two kids now thinking of Dexter as their father, he struggles to calculate how to maintain this and allow his dark passenger time to hunt and kill.</p>
<p>* And then of course he learns the truth. The moment Lithgow erupts at his wife, roaring at her that she&#8217;s a &#8220;CUNT!&#8221;, is astonishing. It&#8217;s like a rock being thrown at a stained glass window, shattering and falling to the ground, the bare reality of the horror revealed. Dexter&#8217;s moment of realisation, that this man is no one to look up to but in fact his next worthy victim, is extraordinary. And then it becomes a fantastic cat-and-mouse chase, Dexter racing not only to kill his new enemy, but also to beat his sister before she solves the crimes. It still has some absolutely terrible dialogue &#8211; for such an original show the writers really do love to lapse into the most ghastly cliché. And the final twist, which I can&#8217;t bring myself to spoil (or believe really happened, for that matter &#8211; can&#8217;t it just be a dream?) means season 5 is going to be&#8230; it&#8217;s going to be traumatic.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/familyguy/">Family Guy &#8211; FOX</a></p>
<p>I think I said most of what I have to say about this <a href="http://botherer.org/2010/02/17/family-guy-and-on-being-offensive/">the other day</a>. But I also think people are talking nonsense with the constant cries of Not As Good As It Used To Be! I remember people saying this after season 1, then it was season 3 when its quality fell, and now it&#8217;s maintained that it was great up until season 5. It&#8217;s still great. Sometimes. Sometimes it&#8217;s pretty average. As has always been the case.</p>
<p><a href="http://fox.com/glee">Glee &#8211; FOX</a> / <a href="http://www.e4.com/glee/">E4</a></p>
<p>Wow, I was watching this, then got a few episodes behind, and suddenly it&#8217;s an international phenomenon with multiple songs in the charts and everyone&#8217;s discussing it everywhere non-stop. Which is odd, since I was convinced it wouldn&#8217;t find an audience. My reasoning being, it was too dark, too clever, and too mean-spirited. The pilot was on TV before the Summer, which was another strange moment. And then POW! Biggest thing ever. So it shows how much I know. Although since I gave up around episode four or five, I think it was declining pretty fast. What I liked about it was that it seemed to be mocking the High School Musical movement. It seems to have become the High School Musical movement. If it&#8217;s managed to do this while remaining as cruel and cynical, then I&#8217;m delighted. But I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve the energy to find out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/house/">House &#8211; FOX/C5</a></p>
<p>* I&#8217;ve heard people argue House is nicer this season. I dispute this. After the end of season 5, with his complete nervous breakdown, the writers had multiple directions to head in. I rather dreaded they&#8217;d pick the easiest &#8211; reset status quo. House gets out of the psychiatric ward, gets hold of pills, everything&#8217;s back the way it was and we carry on. It would have been fine, since the way it was was bloody excellent. But it would be a lame decision. Another terrible idea would have been a redemption pathway for House. They didn&#8217;t do that either. Instead they picked the best route of all.</p>
<p>House clean from opoids is still a dick. He&#8217;s also a far more interesting dick. He&#8217;s gained dimensions. He very occasionally feels guilt. He understands that doing something will upset someone else unfairly. He does it anyway. So people are suggesting this means he&#8217;s now a nicer person. No he&#8217;s not! Now he&#8217;s doing the unbelievably cruel things to his friends and colleagues while able to empathise with the pain it&#8217;s causing.</p>
<p>More than ever the patients are purely background detail for the real focus of an episode. The only equivalent I can think of is Homicide: Life On The Streets, where the murders were not the episode&#8217;s arcing theme, but rather the excuse to see the cast interacting. And thank goodness. I don&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;s an in-joke on the show to have House discover the real cure for a patient at 38 minutes into an episode, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s been an episode in two seasons where it hasn&#8217;t happened in that minute. Even in the most recent episode &#8211; the Cuddy special that didn&#8217;t feature an on-screen patient of any sort &#8211; still managed to have the resolving discovery happen minute 38. Because this is a programme about how House treats his staff and friends, and it&#8217;s utterly excellent. If it became about anything else it would fall to pieces, and the team behind it seem very wise to this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbs.com/primetime/how_i_met_your_mother/">How I Met Your Mother &#8211; CBS</a></p>
<p>This hasn&#8217;t been a good season for HIMYM. It&#8217;s fantastic that it&#8217;s reached a fifth year, despite never receiving the confidence boost from the network of being recommissioned before the end of its current run. But this season has lacked for the rich ideas that made it stand out previously. In fact, it&#8217;s only been able to refer back to previous running gags (goat, slap bet, etc) rather than start any of its own. It&#8217;s still charming, often funny, but the spark is missing.</p>
<p>It came back in force for the glorious 100th episode, which not only had Tim Gunn appear as Barney&#8217;s personal tailor, but also the spectacular Suit Song, along with its gigantic choreography. It was a wonderful episode, and one that seems to have pointed things back in the right direction since. Which is very promising. But I think time is running out for revealing the titular Mother. We&#8217;ve been to her apartment, met her housemate, seen her umbrella, and we know she was in the lecture hall Ted wasn&#8217;t supposed to be in. But guys, you&#8217;re incredibly lucky to get five seasons, and you simply aren&#8217;t going to get ten. Reveal the mother now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/humantarget/">Human Target &#8211; FOX</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only seen the first three so far, but this is gloriously silly fun. Appearing to compete with 24 for overblown situations, it&#8217;s about a private-for-hire bodyguard who protects people in the most dangerous situations. A 300mph train, an on-fire 747, and, er, a party. The star, Mark Valley, looks as though he were carved by the same sculptor as Steve McQueen, and does a fine job of looking confident and sturdy.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://pool.cream.org/blog/human.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>
<p>Thankfully it&#8217;s very aware of its silly high concept, boosted by Chi McBride (Pushing Daisies) and Jackie Earle Haley (Rorschach in the Watchmen movie) both in comic roles. If they can keep the budget to maintain the scale, this will hopefully remain a fun action-movie-as-television series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/23/television-round-up-part-2-f-h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Guy, And On Being Offensive</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/02/17/family-guy-and-on-being-offensive/</link>
		<comments>http://botherer.org/2010/02/17/family-guy-and-on-being-offensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family Guy enjoys being offensive. It does it with glee. As creator Seth McFarlane likes to say, they&#8217;re an &#8220;equal opportunity offender&#8221;. I&#8217;m struggling to think of a subject they haven&#8217;t made wildly inappropriate jokes about. Racial stereotypes, paedophilia, infanticide, rape, degenerative disorders, disabilities, the Holocaust&#8230; A large part of the point of watching the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/familyguy/">Family Guy</a> enjoys being offensive. It does it with glee. As creator Seth McFarlane likes to say, they&#8217;re an &#8220;equal opportunity offender&#8221;. I&#8217;m struggling to think of a subject they haven&#8217;t made wildly inappropriate jokes about. Racial stereotypes, paedophilia, infanticide, rape, degenerative disorders, disabilities, the Holocaust&#8230; A large part of the point of watching the programme is gasping in shock with your hands clasped to your mouth, unsure if you&#8217;re stifling a cry of horror or a laugh.</p>
<p>There have been other programmes that have taken this &#8220;no taboos&#8221; rule to more effective and more shocking places, such as the astonishing <a href="http://www.mtv.com/shows/wonder_showzen/series.jhtml">Wonder Showzen</a>, and <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/drawn_together/index.jhtml">Drawn Together</a>. But these were on cable. Family Guy is on at primetime on Sunday nights on Fox. Having been cancelled twice by the network, it&#8217;s proven itself fairly invincible, and with McFarlane&#8217;s new contract breaking all records they know they&#8217;re not going anywhere. And to embrace this the most recent episodes having been pushing things further and further, including as many digs at Fox as they can cram in. Last Sunday&#8217;s was particularly shocking. At least, I thought so at first.</p>
<p><span id="more-1737"></span></p>
<p>The story focuses around Chris, the dimwitted teenage son, asking a girl with Down&#8217;s syndrome out on a date. Immediately you can make some pretty strong arguments pointing out how non-offensive this is, as Chris has absolutely no problem or concern about her disability. He&#8217;s attracted to her, and wants to go on a date with her. It&#8217;s only Stewie (the baby) who thinks there&#8217;s anything strange about it. But there&#8217;s no point in persisting with that, because it absolutely <i>is</i> offensive. It&#8217;s all out, hell-for-leather offensive. In fact, see if you can spot any joke they didn&#8217;t manage to get into the following truly gob-smackingly offensive song:</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/taIo35sHkNQ&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/taIo35sHkNQ&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>However, what happens next is of interest.</p>
<p>Chris goes on the date, and the girl is a jerk. She&#8217;s rude, selfish, unfair and manipulative. He has a horrible time, because she&#8217;s a douchebag. And I&#8217;d argue that this might just be the most inoffensive portrayal of a disabled person in television history.</p>
<p>Writers fall over themselves to ensure that anyone with a disability is heroic. Just being alive makes them brave! Those poor dears. Even the mighty Steven Moffat fell apart completely when putting a paraplegic character into Press Gang. It&#8217;s the precise opposite of equal opportunities. It&#8217;s patronising, and it&#8217;s embarrassing. Family Guy did an awful lot better.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a larger question about the &#8220;equal opportunity offender&#8221; position to be asked. For instance, Family Guy does jokes based on gross racial stereotypes. It doesn&#8217;t do this because it believes that Asians can&#8217;t drive, or black people can&#8217;t swim, or whatever racist meme they&#8217;re picking up on. It does this because making jokes based on such notions are so ludicrously offensive. The presumed intention is not racism. It&#8217;s shock. The question is, how is an outside observer supposed to distinguish between a joke about all black people being criminals, and a joke about saying that all black people are criminals because you shouldn&#8217;t? And if that distinction isn&#8217;t apparent, is there a distinction at all? In a few decades will we look back on the days of Family Guy, Drawn Together, The Sarah Silverman Program, and so on, and see it as any different from the unironic racism on display in 1970s sitcoms?</p>
<p>The argument is that they&#8217;re offensive to everyone, not picking on any one group or minority. And that&#8217;s true. No one goes un-mocked, whether deaf, old, Latino, white, gay, disabled or murdered in gas chambers. To treat one group (by whichever choice of grouping you might pick) as special is offensive. To say, &#8220;It would be fine if McFarlane only picked on white middle class Americans&#8221; would be the highest hypocrisy.</p>
<p>But at the same time I&#8217;m tempted to believe McFarlane is a sociopath. The jokes <i>will</i> upset people. And not always people who deserve to be upset. (Plus I gave up watching another of his shows, American Dad, because the volume of homophobic jokes led me to wonder if he really did have a problem with gay people. And because it&#8217;s not very funny.) No rape victim deserves to be mocked. But Family Guy mocks rape victims. It mocks rapists too. And it mocks people who are offended by jokes about rape.</p>
<p>This particular episode has come to more attention because <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/17/2822579.htm">Sarah Palin has spoken out about it</a>. And not out of the blue. She has a son with Down&#8217;s syndrome, and the episode makes a direct reference to her. The teenage girl with Down&#8217;s explains that her mother is the former governor of Alaska. It&#8217;s a reference that really doesn&#8217;t make much sense &#8211; Palin has a baby son, this was a teenage girl. But it was a deliberate provocation of the lunatic far-right politician. I&#8217;m not sure what the purpose of the reference was, but it was presumably simply just to be another shocking thing to say. One that, I&#8217;d argue, didn&#8217;t work particularly well. There&#8217;s a million reasons to mock Palin, but her having a disabled son doesn&#8217;t seem like it&#8217;s one of them. But when you have no rules, no boundaries, no taboos, such reasoning doesn&#8217;t apply.</p>
<p>Which leaves me confused about what I think. I find Family Guy very funny. I&#8217;d be a hypocrite to say otherwise. And a big part of that is being astonished by the things it says and shows. But then I also would never wish to apply its principles to my life. I believe in satirising and mocking those who are deserving. But then to make such a statement I&#8217;ve apparently appointed myself arbiter of who deserves to be mocked &#8211; a ridiculous position to put myself in. Family Guy doesn&#8217;t act in such a moralising and hypocritical way as I. So no, I&#8217;ve no fixed position on this at all.</p>
<p>But for one. I believe it&#8217;s okay to be offended. As a white, middle class, 30-something male perhaps I&#8217;m in too luxurious a position to make such a statement. But am I now once more applying the same patronising attitude? It&#8217;s okay for me to be offended because I&#8217;m white and middle class enough to be able to handle it! I&#8217;m turning into Chris Morris&#8217;s character on Brass Eye: &#8220;But what about people less middle class, less educated than me? Builders or blacks for instance?&#8221; So let&#8217;s go back to the beginning: I believe it&#8217;s okay to be offended. I get my fair share of mocking, often cruel, for being a Christian. I see jokes about Jesus or my faith that offend me. My response isn&#8217;t to call for the perpetrator to be silenced. It&#8217;s to be offended for a moment. It&#8217;s not a nice feeling. I live through it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference between being offended and being persecuted. And when we, as a society, treated offence as persecution, we belittle persecution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://botherer.org/2010/02/17/family-guy-and-on-being-offensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
