<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rum Doings Episode 21</title>
	<atom:link href="http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/</link>
	<description>John Walker's Electronic House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebmojo</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebmojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7254</guid>
		<description>Nick I am pleased, surprised and a little nauseated to catch you in an error - sine qua non doesn&#039;t mean &#039;the best of the best&#039; or whatever you said - it means the single vital component.

I suspect you were thinking of ne plus ultra.  

Love the podcasts, listened to this one while doing the shopping.  $5 bottles of red wine, hurrah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick I am pleased, surprised and a little nauseated to catch you in an error &#8211; sine qua non doesn&#8217;t mean &#8216;the best of the best&#8217; or whatever you said &#8211; it means the single vital component.</p>
<p>I suspect you were thinking of ne plus ultra.  </p>
<p>Love the podcasts, listened to this one while doing the shopping.  $5 bottles of red wine, hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>In one of your previous podcasts you reviewed the tesco value shite rum. Would it be possible for you to review the Tesco Superior Dry White Rum in a future podcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of your previous podcasts you reviewed the tesco value shite rum. Would it be possible for you to review the Tesco Superior Dry White Rum in a future podcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blissett</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Blissett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Splendid return to form gents :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Splendid return to form gents :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mailer</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7197</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,

We&#039;ve actually been quite careful not to talk about the topic since the beginning. If you listen carefully, I usually do give a quick throwaway response to the actual topic, or I bring it back &quot;on topic&quot; right at the end in some silly, convoluted manner. 

Also, just because we work hard not to discuss a topic one week doesn&#039;t mean we don&#039;t discuss it later. For example, one week we didn&#039;t discuss what to &quot;do&quot; about the BBC&#039;s licence fee, but we discuss the BBC, its licence fee and so on at other occasions, including last week with Mr Finnemore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve actually been quite careful not to talk about the topic since the beginning. If you listen carefully, I usually do give a quick throwaway response to the actual topic, or I bring it back &#8220;on topic&#8221; right at the end in some silly, convoluted manner. </p>
<p>Also, just because we work hard not to discuss a topic one week doesn&#8217;t mean we don&#8217;t discuss it later. For example, one week we didn&#8217;t discuss what to &#8220;do&#8221; about the BBC&#8217;s licence fee, but we discuss the BBC, its licence fee and so on at other occasions, including last week with Mr Finnemore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7195</guid>
		<description>I quite liked the podcast&#039;s premise, where you noted that interesting discussion can come when you DIVERT from the intended topic. However, it seems that for a while now you don&#039;t bother discussing the topic even for a moment! I know it&#039;s &quot;The topic we aren&#039;t
discussing&quot;, but I would actually like a quick opinion from you chaps as it might be a bit different from what we are used to hearing on the particular subject. Completely ignoring a topic to then go on about Neighbours for just about forever is not diverting from the topic, and is cheating. 

As you can probably tell from my rant, I am something of a purist when it comes to my Rum Doings. I&#039;ll let you off that you don&#039;t always drink rum though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite liked the podcast&#8217;s premise, where you noted that interesting discussion can come when you DIVERT from the intended topic. However, it seems that for a while now you don&#8217;t bother discussing the topic even for a moment! I know it&#8217;s &#8220;The topic we aren&#8217;t<br />
discussing&#8221;, but I would actually like a quick opinion from you chaps as it might be a bit different from what we are used to hearing on the particular subject. Completely ignoring a topic to then go on about Neighbours for just about forever is not diverting from the topic, and is cheating. </p>
<p>As you can probably tell from my rant, I am something of a purist when it comes to my Rum Doings. I&#8217;ll let you off that you don&#8217;t always drink rum though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freudian Trip</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>Freudian Trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a go at myself during Rumdoings but at least I had the decency to pause it. Think of all the knowledge that I&#039;d miss out on while my wrist pumps away furiously for 45 seconds. Frankly, if anything Mr. and Mrs. Suchandsuch should be banned from listening for rudeness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a go at myself during Rumdoings but at least I had the decency to pause it. Think of all the knowledge that I&#8217;d miss out on while my wrist pumps away furiously for 45 seconds. Frankly, if anything Mr. and Mrs. Suchandsuch should be banned from listening for rudeness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vagabond</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>vagabond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>oxford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oxford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs Trellis</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Trellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>The easiest way to nick pint glasses, especially the nice branded ones, is to hand them to a female friend as you are about to leave the pub. She will obligingly drape her coat over the item and waltz past any door security on your behalf.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever knowingly paid money for a pint glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to nick pint glasses, especially the nice branded ones, is to hand them to a female friend as you are about to leave the pub. She will obligingly drape her coat over the item and waltz past any door security on your behalf.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever knowingly paid money for a pint glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colthor</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>Colthor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Oh dear - I may have wound up in a position my memory can only very selectively fulfil.

But if I don&#039;t remember it, it can&#039;t be important. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear &#8211; I may have wound up in a position my memory can only very selectively fulfil.</p>
<p>But if I don&#8217;t remember it, it can&#8217;t be important. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacred_flame101</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/03/17/rum-doings-episode-21/comment-page-1/#comment-7184</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacred_flame101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1796#comment-7184</guid>
		<description>this episode sums up the reason why i so thoroughly enjoy this podcast and wait eagerly for each one to come out

Great podcast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this episode sums up the reason why i so thoroughly enjoy this podcast and wait eagerly for each one to come out</p>
<p>Great podcast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

