<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Television Round-Up Part 1: A-E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/</link>
	<description>John Walker's Electronic House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I love TBBT</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-7018</link>
		<dc:creator>I love TBBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-7018</guid>
		<description>i love shelly! i super love this show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love shelly! i super love this show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6661</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6661</guid>
		<description>So how&#039;s part two coming along John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how&#8217;s part two coming along John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oddtwang</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6617</link>
		<dc:creator>Oddtwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6617</guid>
		<description>Have started watching The Big Bang Theory lately - I&#039;d been avoiding it, I think because E4 made it look like a big pile of stereotype-filled, unfunny wank when they trailed it. As they are wont to.
There are a lot of stereotypes in there, to be sure, but they&#039;re not overdone and there&#039;s some solid writing to go with them. John&#039;s point about it being a very traditional (almost old-fashioned, these days) setup is right - I watched an episode from the first season last night which featured a simple hook (a perfectly adequate lie is rejected by Sheldon, who then goes on to construct an increasingly elaborate one to replace it), 4 characters (one of them a one-off) and about 3 locations, and left it to the writing and performances to deliver it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have started watching The Big Bang Theory lately &#8211; I&#8217;d been avoiding it, I think because E4 made it look like a big pile of stereotype-filled, unfunny wank when they trailed it. As they are wont to.<br />
There are a lot of stereotypes in there, to be sure, but they&#8217;re not overdone and there&#8217;s some solid writing to go with them. John&#8217;s point about it being a very traditional (almost old-fashioned, these days) setup is right &#8211; I watched an episode from the first season last night which featured a simple hook (a perfectly adequate lie is rejected by Sheldon, who then goes on to construct an increasingly elaborate one to replace it), 4 characters (one of them a one-off) and about 3 locations, and left it to the writing and performances to deliver it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliet</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>I really miss defying gravity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really miss defying gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Campbell</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6605</link>
		<dc:creator>James Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6605</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the &#039;Bored to Death&#039; recommendation.  I was feeling really sick yesterday and watched the entire series in one sitting and now I feel much better.

On the other hand the Big Bang Theory is no good at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the &#8216;Bored to Death&#8217; recommendation.  I was feeling really sick yesterday and watched the entire series in one sitting and now I feel much better.</p>
<p>On the other hand the Big Bang Theory is no good at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xercies</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>Xercies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>When will we see Paul Gross again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will we see Paul Gross again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Wow, I thought I watched a lot of US TV but I&#039;ve only seen two of those.

Agreed about Defying Gravity though. Finally got around to watching it the other week and there&#039;s so much potential in it. And no-one has a done a near-future space show in years.

If you&#039;ve not seen it, somewhere online there&#039;s an interview with the show runner that gives a decent idea where it was heading.

Shall have to try this Bored To Death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I thought I watched a lot of US TV but I&#8217;ve only seen two of those.</p>
<p>Agreed about Defying Gravity though. Finally got around to watching it the other week and there&#8217;s so much potential in it. And no-one has a done a near-future space show in years.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve not seen it, somewhere online there&#8217;s an interview with the show runner that gives a decent idea where it was heading.</p>
<p>Shall have to try this Bored To Death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got good taste John, I started watching Better off Ted after you mentioned it last and I think it&#039;s terrific, you&#039;re right in that although Phil and Lem or Veronica appear to be the more outrageous characters, Ted and Linda are every bit as funny. I&#039;ll have to check out Community if you think it&#039;s as good.

I&#039;m also a fan of Chuck, and I&#039;ve really enjoyed how they brought the new &#039;action Chuck&#039; aspect in. From another show it might seem like a cheap rating grab but they really pulled it off.

I&#039;ll be interested to see if any more shows I like turn up later in your list, I suspect they might. Although it was sad to see Burn Notice missing from this one. It&#039;s well worth a watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got good taste John, I started watching Better off Ted after you mentioned it last and I think it&#8217;s terrific, you&#8217;re right in that although Phil and Lem or Veronica appear to be the more outrageous characters, Ted and Linda are every bit as funny. I&#8217;ll have to check out Community if you think it&#8217;s as good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also a fan of Chuck, and I&#8217;ve really enjoyed how they brought the new &#8216;action Chuck&#8217; aspect in. From another show it might seem like a cheap rating grab but they really pulled it off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see if any more shows I like turn up later in your list, I suspect they might. Although it was sad to see Burn Notice missing from this one. It&#8217;s well worth a watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon J. James</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon J. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Hello again John.

Totally agree on Better Off Ted and Community, they are fine shows. I have also began to evaluate Bored to Death on your recommendation.

Have you previously looked at It&#039;s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Lie to Me and the new version of Scrubs?

Great post by the way.

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again John.</p>
<p>Totally agree on Better Off Ted and Community, they are fine shows. I have also began to evaluate Bored to Death on your recommendation.</p>
<p>Have you previously looked at It&#8217;s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Lie to Me and the new version of Scrubs?</p>
<p>Great post by the way.</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2010/01/22/television-round-up-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>innokenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.org/?p=1679#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Being Erica just so... oooh. I really don&#039;t understand how the show and the premise can be enjoyed so much! Great stuff, and clever, free, open and always pleasantly (rather than dumbly) cheery.

Better Off Ted I really can&#039;t get enough of.

Castle I thought was quite genius in Season 1 and only improved more in S2. There was always something in the interaction between Fillion and Kotic that just worked, and it wasn&#039;t just Fillion carrying the show. I must say that I disagree regarding the rest of the cast - I do think that they are very characterful and work. But there we go.

Chuck - yeah... I still dislike the Buy More side of the show, but the spy-side and in S3 Captain Awesome, is just too good to give up on the show as a whole. Also... Casey loves guns.

Dollhouse - can&#039;t but disagree with you. Well, a little bit. Dollhouse really isn&#039;t bad, it&#039;s got bad bits, but on the whole, they have a set of great characters and actors, there is some great writing and... well, Whedon was just being unrealistic when he went back to Fox with this and a plan for several seasons. Having to cram half the seasons into the end of S1 and then the other half into S2 hasn&#039;t helped the show, but all the really great stuff about it is still in there. Still part of the show. And I have to say, I genuinely loved and laughed at a great deal of the show (but perhaps stared open-mouthed and dumb-founded at the rest of it). And Helo, sorry, Ballard, could really have been better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Being Erica just so&#8230; oooh. I really don&#8217;t understand how the show and the premise can be enjoyed so much! Great stuff, and clever, free, open and always pleasantly (rather than dumbly) cheery.</p>
<p>Better Off Ted I really can&#8217;t get enough of.</p>
<p>Castle I thought was quite genius in Season 1 and only improved more in S2. There was always something in the interaction between Fillion and Kotic that just worked, and it wasn&#8217;t just Fillion carrying the show. I must say that I disagree regarding the rest of the cast &#8211; I do think that they are very characterful and work. But there we go.</p>
<p>Chuck &#8211; yeah&#8230; I still dislike the Buy More side of the show, but the spy-side and in S3 Captain Awesome, is just too good to give up on the show as a whole. Also&#8230; Casey loves guns.</p>
<p>Dollhouse &#8211; can&#8217;t but disagree with you. Well, a little bit. Dollhouse really isn&#8217;t bad, it&#8217;s got bad bits, but on the whole, they have a set of great characters and actors, there is some great writing and&#8230; well, Whedon was just being unrealistic when he went back to Fox with this and a plan for several seasons. Having to cram half the seasons into the end of S1 and then the other half into S2 hasn&#8217;t helped the show, but all the really great stuff about it is still in there. Still part of the show. And I have to say, I genuinely loved and laughed at a great deal of the show (but perhaps stared open-mouthed and dumb-founded at the rest of it). And Helo, sorry, Ballard, could really have been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
