<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game Media Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/</link>
	<description>John Walker's Electronic House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rev. S Campbell</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. S Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>Marketing people lie for a living. No matter how lovely they might be - and many are perfectly super people - that&#039;s still their job. So it&#039;s utterly fair to imply that they lack credibility. Of course, maybe you think that the three official magazines really are the best in their fields, in which case you can make the argument that they&#039;re honest and accurate regardless. But otherwise, it&#039;s a bit like saying that someone who opens fire randomly from a shopping-centre overpass with an assault rifle isn&#039;t necessarily a bad person, on the grounds that he happened to hit a paedophile.

Not giving EVERY award to a loathsome cunt is pretty much a pre-requisite for attaching any kind of credence to cynical &quot;awards&quot; events like this. The fact that some people who deserved awards got some here doesn&#039;t change the core of what this event was about one iota, and John&#039;s already done a pretty good job of identifying that. Credibility? Two words: Steve fucking Boxer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing people lie for a living. No matter how lovely they might be &#8211; and many are perfectly super people &#8211; that&#8217;s still their job. So it&#8217;s utterly fair to imply that they lack credibility. Of course, maybe you think that the three official magazines really are the best in their fields, in which case you can make the argument that they&#8217;re honest and accurate regardless. But otherwise, it&#8217;s a bit like saying that someone who opens fire randomly from a shopping-centre overpass with an assault rifle isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad person, on the grounds that he happened to hit a paedophile.</p>
<p>Not giving EVERY award to a loathsome cunt is pretty much a pre-requisite for attaching any kind of credence to cynical &#8220;awards&#8221; events like this. The fact that some people who deserved awards got some here doesn&#8217;t change the core of what this event was about one iota, and John&#8217;s already done a pretty good job of identifying that. Credibility? Two words: Steve fucking Boxer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tombola</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>Tombola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>&quot;What what what? It’s totally fair to say that - not because chaps like Leo aren’t jolly good eggs and whatnot, but because their job presents a huge conflict of interest. I’m sure there are plenty of PRs who can put this aside, but I’m absolutely certain that there are plenty who can’t as well.&quot;

I certainly don&#039;t deny there are some PRs who won&#039;t be able to put aside their loyalties and prejudices, I just don&#039;t believe it&#039;s an absolute. I wouldn&#039;t like my reputation as a writer to hang on what the people I compete against do or say, for instance, and I don&#039;t see too much of a distinction between arguing it does and arguing all PRs lack integrity.

(That said, I did pick up food poisoning the night after I won, so perhaps it&#039;s bigger than any of us understand.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What what what? It’s totally fair to say that &#8211; not because chaps like Leo aren’t jolly good eggs and whatnot, but because their job presents a huge conflict of interest. I’m sure there are plenty of PRs who can put this aside, but I’m absolutely certain that there are plenty who can’t as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t deny there are some PRs who won&#8217;t be able to put aside their loyalties and prejudices, I just don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s an absolute. I wouldn&#8217;t like my reputation as a writer to hang on what the people I compete against do or say, for instance, and I don&#8217;t see too much of a distinction between arguing it does and arguing all PRs lack integrity.</p>
<p>(That said, I did pick up food poisoning the night after I won, so perhaps it&#8217;s bigger than any of us understand.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>Bramwell and Gillen are both good writers and Eurogamer is a mighty fine website, so at least something not-awful came of this.

Quoth Tombola: &quot;it is unfair to imply that the people who vote lack personal credibility on the basis that they are PRs, marketing men, or whoever.&quot;

What what what? It&#039;s totally fair to say that - not because chaps like Leo aren&#039;t jolly good eggs and whatnot, but because their job presents a huge conflict of interest. I&#039;m sure there are plenty of PRs who can put this aside, but I&#039;m absolutely certain that there are plenty who can&#039;t as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bramwell and Gillen are both good writers and Eurogamer is a mighty fine website, so at least something not-awful came of this.</p>
<p>Quoth Tombola: &#8220;it is unfair to imply that the people who vote lack personal credibility on the basis that they are PRs, marketing men, or whoever.&#8221;</p>
<p>What what what? It&#8217;s totally fair to say that &#8211; not because chaps like Leo aren&#8217;t jolly good eggs and whatnot, but because their job presents a huge conflict of interest. I&#8217;m sure there are plenty of PRs who can put this aside, but I&#8217;m absolutely certain that there are plenty who can&#8217;t as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: העולם על פי אינטל &#187; ארכיון הבלוג &#187; ברכות לקיירון! (והפעם, ברצינות)</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>העולם על פי אינטל &#187; ארכיון הבלוג &#187; ברכות לקיירון! (והפעם, ברצינות)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>[...] ובכן, הוא זכה. ובכך הגיעה לסיומו סיפור ממושך ומעט-הזוי. בעוד שחברו למקצוע, ג&#8217;ון ווקר (כתב מוצלח מאוד בזכות עצמו) קורא לו (ולמעשה, לכל שאר הזוכים) לוותר על הפרס, קיירון גילן אומר שהפרסים הללו בכל מקרה לא משנים יותר מדי, ושהחרמה שלהם רק תתן להם חשיבות שלא ממש מגיעה להם, ומוציאה אותו כפוץ מנופח. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ובכן, הוא זכה. ובכך הגיעה לסיומו סיפור ממושך ומעט-הזוי. בעוד שחברו למקצוע, ג&#8217;ון ווקר (כתב מוצלח מאוד בזכות עצמו) קורא לו (ולמעשה, לכל שאר הזוכים) לוותר על הפרס, קיירון גילן אומר שהפרסים הללו בכל מקרה לא משנים יותר מדי, ושהחרמה שלהם רק תתן להם חשיבות שלא ממש מגיעה להם, ומוציאה אותו כפוץ מנופח. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron Gillen&#8217;s Workblog &#187; Once And Never Again</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron Gillen&#8217;s Workblog &#187; Once And Never Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay - the award. Well, Walker&#8217;s already said that Tom and I should have turned it down. Stuart&#8217;s already said I violates the memory of AP, in his usual cheery idiom. And past me has called present me a lapdog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay &#8211; the award. Well, Walker&#8217;s already said that Tom and I should have turned it down. Stuart&#8217;s already said I violates the memory of AP, in his usual cheery idiom. And past me has called present me a lapdog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>It was about relevance, not ability. And was hardly the crux of my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was about relevance, not ability. And was hardly the crux of my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Krouwel</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Krouwel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>It was this line that prompted my reponse:

&quot;Shall they next be voting for the best greengrocers at the Greengrocer Awards, because they eat fruit and vegetables?&quot;

Which seems to be stating that consumers shouldn&#039;t be judging producers.  Seemed like an odd thing to say, so I brought it up. Sorry if it sounded acusatory though, I should of course have used &#039;one&#039; where I said &#039;you&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was this line that prompted my reponse:</p>
<p>&#8220;Shall they next be voting for the best greengrocers at the Greengrocer Awards, because they eat fruit and vegetables?&#8221;</p>
<p>Which seems to be stating that consumers shouldn&#8217;t be judging producers.  Seemed like an odd thing to say, so I brought it up. Sorry if it sounded acusatory though, I should of course have used &#8216;one&#8217; where I said &#8216;you&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. S Campbell</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. S Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>BEST PLAYSTATION MAGAZINE
Official Playstation Magazine (Future)

BEST NINTENDO MAGAZINE
Official Nintendo Magazine (Future)

BEST XBOX MAGAZINE
Official Xbox Magazine (Future)

BEST GAMES WRITER ON NATIONAL NEWSPAPER
Steve Boxer (Guardian)

Congratulations, Kieron and Tom. You&#039;re truly part of the industry now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEST PLAYSTATION MAGAZINE<br />
Official Playstation Magazine (Future)</p>
<p>BEST NINTENDO MAGAZINE<br />
Official Nintendo Magazine (Future)</p>
<p>BEST XBOX MAGAZINE<br />
Official Xbox Magazine (Future)</p>
<p>BEST GAMES WRITER ON NATIONAL NEWSPAPER<br />
Steve Boxer (Guardian)</p>
<p>Congratulations, Kieron and Tom. You&#8217;re truly part of the industry now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>If it had been on your blog Rammy, I&#039;d have dropped dead of shock that you were posting a reasoned diatribe that actually met the remit you claim to exist for : )

You know, rather than attacking the websites helplessly nominated by these cretinous awards for not being advert free, rather than the awards themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it had been on your blog Rammy, I&#8217;d have dropped dead of shock that you were posting a reasoned diatribe that actually met the remit you claim to exist for : )</p>
<p>You know, rather than attacking the websites helplessly nominated by these cretinous awards for not being advert free, rather than the awards themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. S Campbell</title>
		<link>http://botherer.org/2007/10/10/game-media-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. S Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://botherer.cream.org/?p=796#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>Except, of course, that there&#039;s no mention of corruption anywhere in the post. Or, come to that, stupidity or incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except, of course, that there&#8217;s no mention of corruption anywhere in the post. Or, come to that, stupidity or incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
